Williams v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury verdict finding her guilty of unlawful use of a credit card, a violation of NRS 205.500.
Since the appellant has cited no authorities in support of her position, this court is not required to consider the assignment of error. Howarth v. El Sobrante Mining Corp., 87 Nev. 492, 489 P.2d 89 (1971); Carson v. Sheriff, 87 Nev. 357, 487 P.2d 334 (1971); Smithart v. State, 86 Nev. 925, 478 P.2d 576 (1970). We have, however, reviewed the entire record and found therein substantial evidence to prove each and every…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Smithart v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Sanchez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Carson v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- Collins v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- Howarth v. EL SOBRANTE MINING CORPORATIONNevada Supreme Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Cunningham v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- Franklin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Allen v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Jones v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995
- Barcus v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.