In the Matter of: Ale.P., Ala.P., and J.P., Children Alleged to be in Need of Services, C.R. and A.R. v. The Indiana Department of Child Services
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Brown, Judge.
C.R. (“Foster Father”) and A.R. (“Foster Mother” and together with Foster Father, “Foster Parents”) appeal the juvenile court’s order denying their motion for the return of Ale.P., Ala.P., and J.P. (collectively, the “Children”). Foster Parents raise two issues which we revise and restate as:
I. Whether they were deprived of due process; and
II. Whether the court erred in denying their motion for return of the Children.
We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
On February 6, 2013, the biological parents of the Children admitted that the Children were in need of services, and on March…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & ReformSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Monroe Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Magwerks Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re the Guardianship of B.H.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Z.G. v. Marion County Department of Child ServicesIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.