Legal Opinion

In the Matter of: Ale.P., Ala.P., and J.P., Children Alleged to be in Need of Services, C.R. and A.R. v. The Indiana Department of Child Services

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 28, 2017No. Court of Appeals Case 52A02-1612-JC-2864Published

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, Judge.

C.R. (“Foster Father”) and A.R. (“Foster Mother” and together with Foster Father, “Foster Parents”) appeal the juvenile court’s order denying their motion for the return of Ale.P., Ala.P., and J.P. (collectively, the “Children”). Foster Parents raise two issues which we revise and restate as:

I. Whether they were deprived of due process; and

II. Whether the court erred in denying their motion for return of the Children.

We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

On February 6, 2013, the biological parents of the Children admitted that the Children were in need of services, and on March…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & ReformSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Monroe Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Magwerks Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re the Guardianship of B.H.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Z.G. v. Marion County Department of Child ServicesIndiana Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API