Zwickler v. Koota
District Court, E.D. New York
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
ROSLING, District Judge.
This dissent is only from so much of the majority’s holding that the basic, but residual, question of constitutionality of Penal Law § 781-b should be passed back to the state courts for adjudication while we abstain. The question of constitutionality, however, is necessarily reached if the dissent correctly holds that we must not abstain. That the provision is unconstitutional for overbreadth the Attorney Genera] in his brief substantially acknowledges by citing the legislative history of the most recent (1962) amendment of the provision as basis for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.