Legal Opinion

Guerin v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to St. Clair. (Stevens, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion and head-note.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

This was an action of assumpsit, containing one count upon a covenant and the common counts. *372The count on covenant set out a deed from defendant to Daniel J. Guerin, plaintiff’s grantor, and the deed' from Daniel to plaintiff. Defendant was alleged to have covenanted against incumbrances and grants, and that he would warrant and defend against all lawful claims. The count then sets out an outstanding mortgage, which was foreclosed and that subsequently plaintiff received a reconveyance from the purchaser on the sale, on payment of the price and inter est.

The case seems to have been tried…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davenport v. Estate of DavenportMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McClure v. DeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Soderberg v. HoltUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Dahl v. StakkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Pease v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API