Legal Opinion
Kennedy v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 14, 1927No. 615PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, District Judge.
The patent in suit No. 1,436,338 to Carman, assignor to Joseph E. Kennedy, the plaintiff, has to do with improved driving means for his gy*531ratory stone crusher of the type described in Worthington Pump & Machinery Co. v. Traylor Engineering & Mfg. Co., 1 F.(2d) 833 (C. C. A. 3). More particularly it has to do with the mounting — how and where— of the driver and with the means connecting the driver with the operative parts of the erusher. The erusher, which, fundamentally, is but a crushing chamber through which passes a lever of the second order fulerumed at its upper…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Weber Electric Co. v. E. H. Freeman Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Traylor Engineering & Mfg. Co. v. Worthington Pump & Machinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
- Standard Paint Co. v. BirdU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Molthan v. Temple University--Of of Commonwealth System of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Bouman v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
- Nippon Paper Industries USA Co Ltd v. Georgia Pacific LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023