Legal Opinion

Ricardo L. Whyms v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 17, 2016No. 4D15-3473PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Ricardo L. Whyms appeals an order denying his rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. We affirm but for reasons other than those given by the trial court.

In 2003, Whyms entered a negotiated plea to robbery with a firearm. ■ Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Whyms was sentenced to a ten-year mandatory minimum under -the 10-20-Life law 1 consecutive to ■ any active sentence. In the present motion, Whyms contends that the mandatory minimum is illegal because the judge did not orally pronounce it.

The trial court denied the motion attaching the State’s response, which argiied thát…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. Ashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  4. Dunbar v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Donald McCormick v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API