Legal Opinion

Noah U. v. Tribune Co. Medical Plan

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 7, 2015No. CASE NO. 2:14-CV-03062-SVW-AJWPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DETERMINING THE STANDARD OF REVIEW AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE TRIBUNE’S 2012 PLAN [53]

STEPHEN V. WILSON, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Noah U.1 brought this case against his insurer, defendant Tribune Company Medical Plan (“the Plan”), after his insurance claim for treatment of his eating disorder was denied. The Court-is presently called upon to decide the applicable standard of review. Also before the Court is Plaintiffs motion to strike the 2012 Plan document pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37. (Dkt.53.) For the reasons discussed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchenSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Washington v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API