Legal Opinion
Jesse W. Tolefree v. Harry Ritz, Badge No. 19, City of Richmond Police Department, First Doe, Second Doe, Third Doe, Seventh Doe
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided August 3, 1967No. 20477_1PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
Jesse W. Tolefree, proceeding pro. per., commenced this action under the Civil Rights Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1343(1), (3) and (4) (1964), and Rev.Stat. § 1979 (1875), 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1964), to recover damages from Harry Ritz, the City of Richmond, and seven “Does.”
Defendants moved to dimiss the action for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter. The district court granted the motion with leave to amend. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Egan v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ellen Molnar v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Mrs. Mary Ellen Pritchard, Wife of Charles C. Pritchard v. Eugene G. Smith, Chief of Police, City of Little Rock, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- California Stevedore & Ballast Co., a Corporation, and Yerba Buena Corporation, a Corporation v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wiltsie v. California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Craig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Scheetz v. Morning Call, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Provience v. Valley Clerks Trust FundDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1981
- Agresta v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.