Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 18, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered on or about November 3, 1999, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, denied first third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the first third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We find, contrary to the view of the motion court, that, under the circumstances, third-party defendant Fred Geller Electrical, Inc. (Geller) demonstrated good cause to move for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, based on the asserted applicability of the antisubrogation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania General Insurance v. Austin Powder Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. North Star Reinsurance Corp. v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. DeJesus v. Tyree OrganizationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. DeJesus v. Tyree OrganizationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API