Legal Opinion

People v. Ingham

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1992No. F016086PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEST, P. J.

Defendant, Peggy Ingham, was charged with possession of methamphetamine for sale. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378.) The trial court ordered all evidence suppressed and discharged defendant. (Pen. Code, § 1538.5.) Thereafter, the district attorney filed this appeal under Penal Code section 1238.

Statement of the Facts

After being told an anonymous source had implicated defendant’s residence in drug sales, Officer Charles Maxwell asked Officer Marianne Moll-ring to serve a $2,000 traffic warrant on defendant. Officer Mollring was told about the drug allegation and was instructed to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Illinois v. LafayetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MacHupaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. Humberto O.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. People v. Rodriguez CA6California Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API