Legal Opinion

Herold v. Pioneer Trust Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

Plaintiffs recovered a verdict and judgment in the sum of $687.50. The trial court sustained defendant’s motion for a new trial giving as a reason therefor “that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for defendant as requested by defendant,” and plaintiffs have appealed. Defendant at the close of plaintiffs ’ evidence offered an instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence which the court overruled. Defendant did not put on any testimony but the case was submitted to the jury upon instructions for both parties. Plaintiffs offered no instruction upon any theory of recovery…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dunn v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. Newland Hotel Co. v. Lowe Furniture Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Chieppo v. ChieppoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  4. People's National Bank v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  5. Koontz v. KaufmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Powers v. ShoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API