Legal Opinion

State v. Holloman

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 19, 1992PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUMMERS, Judge.

Appellant, Robert Holloman, presents this appeal as of right from two convictions for possession of cocaine with intent to sell or deliver. Appellant also challenges the two concurrent seven-year sentences imposed by the trial court. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the lower court in all respects.

The criminal charges levied against appellant arise from events taking place during an undercover drug investigation performed by the Tennessee Highway Patrol. Troopers Aaron Chism and Wayne Vasser set up an investigation in Humboldt, Tennessee, in an area known as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. CabbageTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. GraceTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. SheffieldTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. ScottTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. DeanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  4. Jamelle M. Felts v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
  5. Quinzell Lawon Grasty v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API