Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Tennessee Wildcat Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 3, 1988No. Nos. 87-5002, 87-5047PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LIVELY, Chief Judge.

The question to be answered in these consolidated appeals is whether signers of promissory notes, who claim to have signed as corporate agents, sufficiently complied with legal requirements for avoiding personal liability. Holding that the signers had so complied, the district court, in separate orders, granted summary judgment in their favor. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), holder of the notes in its corporate capacity by virtue of purchase and assumption transactions, appeals, and we affirm.

I

A

Pertinent to our inquiry are the following portions of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Richard M. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. Petty v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  3. United States v. Duane G. Willis and Mary J. WillisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  4. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. AllenDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1984
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Bernard E. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Tennessee Wildcat Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API