Legal Opinion

Burr v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 15, 1851PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Petition for a new trial. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court, which was delivered by

1Opinion of the CourtRedfield, J.

This is a petition for a new trial, on the ground of surprise at the trial and newly discovered evidence. The petitionees have put into the case a large amount of counter evidence, in the form of ex parte affidavits. This testimony was objected to at the time it was offered, and is said, in argument, to be a loose and indecisive and unsatisfactory mode of encountering a case once made out upon a petition for a new trial. The court, I think, fully concur in all that has been said, or that can be said, against the propriety of receiving such evidence. But although it has been repeatedly said by…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1925
  2. Johnson v. RuleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  3. Reynolds v. HassamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1884
  4. Usher v. AllenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  5. Darbee v. ElwoodNew York Supreme Court · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API