Legal Opinion
In re Goldstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 5, 2004PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Arthur L. Goldstein was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on December 12, 1958. At all times pertinent to this proceeding, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
On December 23, 2002, respondent was served with a notice and statement of charges in which it was alleged that he misused two escrow accounts by maintaining the accounts solely for his business and personal affairs while his personal bank accounts were levied by tax authorities, in…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In re BetancourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- United States v. CutiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
- In re RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re LiedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
4Cited by11 opinions
- In re AlejandroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re DalnokyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re SilvaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re PritikinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.