Legal Opinion

Finuf v. Johnson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1968No. 11114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AYRES, Judge.

Writs of certiorari, mandamus, and prohibition were granted to review the propriety of an action of the court below in striking from the record defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The motion to strike is predicated primarily upon the proposition that no service of the motion for a new trial nor notice of the time and place assigned for a hearing thereon was made upon or given plaintiff or his counsel as contemplated by LSA-C.C.P. Arts. 1314 and 1976.

In the judgment of which defendant complains, plaintiff was decreed the owner and, as such, entitled to the possession of a described…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McDonald v. O'MearaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bunge Corporation v. EmmonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Finuf v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Bowman v. Weill Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Finuff v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API