People v. McCann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s argument that the Trial Judge should have recused himself because he issued the search warrant while sitting as a Town Court Justice (see, People v Barone, 109 AD2d 1075, 1076-1077, lv denied 72 NY2d 856). Absent a legal disqualification under Judiciary Law § 14, a Trial Judge is the sole arbiter of recusal (People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405).
The court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence seized pursuant to the warrant. The statements made to police by the codefendant were, standing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- People v. MorenoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. CortijoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. WheatmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nevayaktewa v. Hopi TribeHopi Appellate Court · 1998
- People v. StoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009