Legal Opinion
Gross v. Pellicane
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 24, 1961PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
65 N.J. Super. 386 (1961)
167 A.2d 838
GEORGE FRANKLIN GROSS, JR., PETITIONER,
v.
MARTHA PELLICANE, JOSEPH PELLICANE AND LILY DEMING, RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Monmouth County Court, Law Division.
Decided January 24, 1961.
Messrs. Taub & Taub, attorneys for petitioner.
Messrs. Parsons, Canzona, Blair & Smith, attorneys for respondents Martha and Joseph Pellicane.
Mr. James J. Carroll, attorney for respondent Lily Deming.
GIORDANO, J.C.C.
This proceeding involves two appeals from an award of the Division of Workmen's Compensation in favor of the petitioner George Franklin Gross, Jr.,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moore v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Marcus v. Eastern Agricultural Ass'n, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Marcus v. Eastern Agricultural Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Hannigan v. GoldfarbNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Mahoney v. Nitroform Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blessing v. T. Shriver and Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Clark v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- Rock v. Commissioner of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Walrond v. County of SomersetNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- Grant v. Blazer Coord. Coun. of Youth Dev.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.