Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 19, 2013No. 20120122-CAPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTH, Judge:

1 Robert Proctor appeals from the unfavorable result in his negligence suit against Costco Wholesale Corporation. Specifically, Proctor asserts that the trial court improperly granted a partial directed verdict in favor of Costco on two of his allegations of negligence and abused its discretion when it declined to reinstate one of the two allegations after Costco elicited testimony on the issue during the presentation of its defense. Proctor also challenges the trial court's denial of his own motion for directed verdict. Finally, Proctor claims that there was insufficient…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Allen v. FrielUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Nixdorf v. HickenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Billings v. Union Bankers Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Liley v. Cedar Springs Ranch Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  3. State v. NichollsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  4. Utah Dep't of Transp. v. Target Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  5. Davis v. Walmart StoresCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API