Legal Opinion

People v. Fleshman

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1915No. Crim. No. 369PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. T. L. Lewis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. J. Morganstern, and Morganstern, McGee, Henning & Hendee, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Defendant was convicted upon an' information charging him with the crime of obtaining money by false pretenses.

He appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The material allegations of the information are that defendant, with intent to cheat and defraud it, represented to the American National Bank that it had theretofore made and executed a certain contract with the Parker Company, which he represented to be a corporation engaged in publishing a directory, designated as the Western States Business Gazetteer, which contract was in words and figures as follows:…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. People v. GleasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. People v. LapiqueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. People v. BeilfussCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. State v. GauntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API