Legal Opinion
People v. Napoli
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 3, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that his absence from an in-chambers conference held prior to jury selection deprived him of the right to be present at a Ventimiglia hearing (see, People v Spotford, 196 AD2d 179, Iv granted 83 NY2d 915). The record fully supports Supreme Court’s determination, made after a reconstruction hearing, that the limited discussion at the in-chambers conference did not constitute a Ventimiglia hearing. Neither defendant nor the People made an application for a Ventimiglia ruling; no factual or legal arguments were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. OdiatNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. SpotfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. MammarelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. VogelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. FurtickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. PetersonNew York Supreme Court · 1995