Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Templeton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1908No. 21,055PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Clinton Circuit Court; Joseph Claybaugh, Judge. Drainage proceeding by Martha M. Templeton, against which Joseph F. Stevens and others remonstrate. From a judgment against the remonstrants, they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Appellee filed her petition in the Clinton Circuit Court for the establishment of a drain under the act of 1905 (Acts 1905, p. 456, §5622 et seq. Burns 1905). The matter was duly referred to the drainage commissioners, and, upon the filing of their final report, appellants severally remonstrated against the same. These remonstrances contained the same allegations, and the body of each was as follows: “(1) That said report is not made according to law; (2) that said report is not made according to law in *249this, to wit, that said report does not contain any estimate of the costs, damages and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. GustinIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Kline v. HageyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stevens v. TempletonIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. CloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Lake Shore Sand Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API