Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Silva

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 31, 1991Published

1Concurrence

A.M. STEIN, J.A.D.,

concurring.

We reverse and remand this case for a new trial because we reject the unyielding holding in State v. Plowden, 126 N.J.Super. 228, 313 A.2d 802 (App.Div.1974), certif. denied, 64 N.J. 504, 317 A.2d 717 (1974), that the failure of a sister to provide an alibi to police soon after her brother’s arrest “was inconsistent with what one could reasonably expect she would have done” had defendant been in her apartment at the time of the murder with which he was charged. 126 N.J.Super. at 230, 313 A.2d 802.

It would be unrealistic to expect Jose Silva’s sister to run to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. DawsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State v. IrvingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. GregoryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. State v. PlowdenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. State v. AcetaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API