Legal Opinion · Dissent

Morris v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 30, 1939No. A-9528Published

1DissentBarefoot, J.

It is not often that the views of the members of this court are not unanimous. I cannot concur altogether with the views expressed in the foregoing opinion, and for that reason I am compelled to express my views herein. Knowing that this question will come before this court for consideration many times, I desire, in a few words, to express my views thereon. In the first place, the members of this court are in perfect accord on practically all aspects of the “search and seizure law.” That this law should be strictly construed, and that officers of the law should not be permitted, by reason of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Scher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Kurtz v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API