Legal Opinion

United States v. Phillip L. Segal

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 26, 1988No. 87-1238PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Phillip Segal was convicted of aiding and abetting a failure to file currency transaction reports (“CTRs”), under 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 31 U.S.C. § 1058. Segal was also convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States, under 18 U.S.C'. § 371.

Segal claims that the Government elicited evidence at trial of unrelated misconduct, that he is not liable as a mere bank “customer,” and that the conspiracy conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 371 cannot be punished as a felony, since the accompanying conviction was a misdemeanor.

We affirm.

I

In 1979, Segal (“appellant”) became…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. Murad NersesianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Elsayed Mukhtar v. California State University, HaywardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Hector Ramirez-JiminezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Horst Werner Joetzki, United States of America v. Lawrence Carl GisnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Jay KerrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. State v. CareySupreme Court of Iowa · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API