United States v. Phillip L. Segal
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Phillip Segal was convicted of aiding and abetting a failure to file currency transaction reports (“CTRs”), under 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 31 U.S.C. § 1058. Segal was also convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States, under 18 U.S.C'. § 371.
Segal claims that the Government elicited evidence at trial of unrelated misconduct, that he is not liable as a mere bank “customer,” and that the conspiracy conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 371 cannot be punished as a felony, since the accompanying conviction was a misdemeanor.
We affirm.
I
In 1979, Segal (“appellant”) became…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Murad NersesianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Elsayed Mukhtar v. California State University, HaywardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Hector Ramirez-JiminezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Horst Werner Joetzki, United States of America v. Lawrence Carl GisnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jay KerrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- State v. CareySupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.