Legal Opinion

Dewey v. National Surety Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the action does not involve a long account >vithin the meaning of section 466 of the Civil Practice Act; while numerous items are involved they are items of damage, which were merely incidental and do not constitute an account between the parties. (Camp v. Ingersoll, 86 N. Y. 433; Untermyer v. Beinhauer, 105 id. 521; Johnson v. Atlantic Ave. R. R. Co., 139 id. 449; Townsend v. Hendricks, 40 How. Pr. 143, 162,163; Steck v. C. F. & I. Co., 142 N. Y. 236; Snell v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Camp v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Townsend v. HendricksNew York Court of Appeals · 1870

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Central School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. Josco Contracting & Construction Co. v. F. R. A. Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API