Pilgrim Distribut. Corp. v. Terminal Transp. Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
DAVID S. PORTER, District Judge.
The instant action was brought pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (diversity jurisdiction) and Title 49 U.S.C. §§ 319 and 20 (11) (“Carmack Amendment” to the Interstate Commerce Act) and tried by the court without a jury.
Plaintiff, Pilgrim Distributing Corporation (“Pilgrim”) is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Kentucky, with its principal place of business in the State of Kentucky. Plaintiff is engaged in the business of wholesaling wine and liquors.
Defendant, Terminal Transport Company, Inc.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Southern Railway Co. v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Secretary of Agriculture v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Robinson v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Lowden v. Simonds-Shields-Lonsdale Grain Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Man Roland, Inc. v. Kreitz Motor Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Pnh Corporation v. Hullquist Corporation, Garvey Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Ensco, Inc. v. Weicker Transfer & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Ensco, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. Weicker Transfer and Storage Co., and Third-Party v. Warren Jaycox v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Third Party Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Starboard Holdings Ltd. v. ABF Freight Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017