Legal Opinion

Lusk v. Wilkes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1917No. 8265PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

EDWARDS, . 0.

The defendant in error will be referred to as plaintiff, and the plaintiffs in error as defendants, according to their position in the lower court.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff in the district court upon a petition setting out two causes of action. In the first cause of action it is alleged that the plaintiff was. at the time of the injury sued for, in the employ of the United States government as a railway mail clerk, and was engaged in the performance of his duties as such, on a train operated between the cities of Denison, Tex., and Sapulpa, Okla,; that…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Gleeson v. Virginia Midland RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Mellor v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. State ex rel. HauerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  4. Weber v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  5. Martin v. Pittsburg & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. WolfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. AkinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  4. Oklahoma, K. & M. R. Co. v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API