Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hendershot v. Charleston National Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1990No. 27S02-9011-CV-746Published

1DissentPivarnik, Justice

I dissent to the holding of the majority that the guarantor is not released from his obligation. I would deny transfer or grant transfer and affirm the Court of Appeals as I feel it reached a proper result considering the facts and circumstances of this case.

Judge Buchanan, writing for the majority, acknowledged the application of Section 122(b) of the Restatement of Securities which provides that where the creditor releases a principal debtor the surety is discharged unless the creditor in the release reserves his rights against the surety. As Judge Buchanan pointed out, this contemplates…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gholson v. SavinOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hendershot v. Charleston National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API