Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Paris

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1928No. 4544PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tim McCarthy commenced this action January 15, 1924, against appellant and her son, Orval J. Paris, to recover for wages as farm laborer from March 29, 1919, to January 16, 1920, inclusive, alleging said services to have been reasonably worth the sum of $75 per month. The complaint admits payment of $122 on account, and alleges a balance due of $547. The answer denies the allegations of the complaint, alleges $50 per month is a reasonable sum for the services rendered, that said sum was the agreed price, and that there is nothing due or owing on account of labor performed for appellant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bank of Commerce, Ltd. v. BaldwinIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Ah How v. FurthWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Jaeckel v. PeaseIdaho Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Morrissey v. FaucettWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Grisham v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Eagle Water Co., Inc. v. Roundy Pole Fence Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hendrix v. Gold Ridge Mines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Seubert Excavators, Inc. v. Eucon Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Kugler v. Northwest Aviation, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Hubbard v. BallIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API