Legal Opinion

Kent v. Rothensies

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1940No. 712PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This is an action for the recovery of additional income taxes paid for the years 1932, 1933, and 1934, amounting in all, with interest, to $302,958.17. The trial was to the court without a jury, and the evidence consists of a stipulation covering all relevant facts.

The question involved is whether certain income accumulated by the trustees of three identical trusts, established in 1932 by the plaintiff for members of his family, is taxable to the trustees or 'is to be included in the grantor’s income.

*293The statute directly involved is Sec. 167(a) (1) of the Revenue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Smietanka, Collector of Internal Revenue v. First Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kent v. RothensiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  2. Graff v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  3. Phipps v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API