Legal Opinion

Tesini v. Zawistowski

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 13, 1985No. Nos. 84-2511, 84-2589PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTS, Judge.

Time stated to be of the essence in a purchase and sale agreement, the trial court found the actual closing should have been finalized on the date set in the agreement. We reverse.

The agreement called for a closing on Monday, September 5, 1983, which the parties later realized was Labor Day. Accordingly, the buyer’s attorney granted a one day extension until September 6th on which latter date the seller was ready, willing, and able to close. Notwithstanding, the buyer argued that his attorney had no authority to grant the extension and in any *776case that he adequately revoked it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Griffith v. Investment Co., a Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Benson v. SeestromDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leviton v. Philly Steak-Out, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Arvilla Motel, Inc. v. ShriverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Bajwa v. Prime Healthcare Services-Lehigh Acres, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API