Legal Opinion

United States v. Guadalupe Velazquez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 1, 2017No. 14-10311PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Concurrence by Judge KOZINSKI

OPINION

FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judge:

Guadalupe Velazquez seeks to vacate a guilty plea on the ground that she was constructively denied her right to counsel when the district court denied her motions to substitute counsel without conducting an adequate inquiry. We agree that the district court abused its discretion in denying Velazquez’s motions and thus vacate the convictions that resulted from her plea.

I. BACKGROUND

A

Guadalupe Velazquez was in her late teens and on a scholarship at Arizona State University when she began dating Hector Ortiz, Jr. At some point, Ortiz…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Sackett v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Appel v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. United States v. Joan McKennaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Martel v. ClairSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. PradoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. People of Guam v. Michael Anthony LibbySupreme Court of Guam · 2021
  3. Kevin Singer v. Richard RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Martinelli v. NeuschmidDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  5. NEWMONES v. RANSOMDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API