Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 11, 2008No. AC 28720PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The petitioner, Christopher Coleman, appeals from the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, he claims that the habeas court abused its discretion by refusing to rule on his petition for certification to appeal. The petitioner further claims that the claims raised in his habeas corpus petition, if proven, would establish a due process violation. The court, in dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, stated that the petition did not present a claim on which the habeas court could grant relief. We dismiss the appeal.
The following facts…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Benjamin Cruz v. Giovanny Gomez, I/o and Classification CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Diaz v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Anthony A. v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Boria v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Fuller v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Joyce v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.