Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Walbridge

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 14, 1939PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

In Surrogate’s Court practice the term “ testamentary expenses ” is well understood as connoting merely the customary disbursements attendant upon the ordinary administration of the estate. It cannot be expanded to include the impost levied by governmental authority upon the net avails of the estate.

Section 124 of the Decedent Estate Law reflects the policy of the State that the taxes imposed upon estates shall be prorated. This policy is capable of reversal as to any individual decedent “ in a case where a testator otherwise directs in his will.” To accomplish such reversal of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of KaufmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re DettmerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
  2. Jerome v. JeromeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. In re the Estate of BlumenthalNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
  4. Brauburger v. SheridanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. In re the Estate of McManamyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API