In re the Estate of Walbridge
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
In Surrogate’s Court practice the term “ testamentary expenses ” is well understood as connoting merely the customary disbursements attendant upon the ordinary administration of the estate. It cannot be expanded to include the impost levied by governmental authority upon the net avails of the estate.
Section 124 of the Decedent Estate Law reflects the policy of the State that the taxes imposed upon estates shall be prorated. This policy is capable of reversal as to any individual decedent “ in a case where a testator otherwise directs in his will.” To accomplish such reversal of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re the Estate of KaufmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re DettmerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
- Jerome v. JeromeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- In re the Estate of BlumenthalNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
- Brauburger v. SheridanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- In re the Estate of McManamyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.