Legal Opinion

Howes Bros. Hide Co. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 16, 1931No. 2533PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

This appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals presents the question as to whether the Howes Brothers Company, the Howes Brothers Hide Company, and the Huntington Shoe 6 Leather Company may (all or any two of them) be affiliated within the meaning of the Revenue Act of 1918, c. 18, § 249 (b), 49 Stat. 1957, 1982, which reads:

“For the purpose of this section two or more domestic corporations shall be deemed to be affiliated (1) if one corporation owns directly or controls through closely affiliated interests or by a nominee or nominees substantially all the stock of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Adolph Hirsch & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  2. United States v. CLEVELAND, P. & ER CO.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  3. Great Lakes Hotel Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Shillito Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  5. Goldstein Bros. Amusement Co. v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ground Gripper Shoe Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API