Sussex Fire Ins. Co. v. Barton
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The action is on a policy of fire insurance. A storehouse, stock of merchandise, and store furniture and fixtures were insured in the gross sum of $3,500. The insurance on the house was $1,000, on the stock of merchandise $2,000, and on the furniture and fixtures $500.
Count 1 of the complaint was in code form, claiming the gross sum for a total loss of the insured property by fire.
Defendant- presented certain special pleas setting up breaches of the iron-safe clause as a full answer to the complaint. Admittedly the iron-safe clause is limited to-the stock of merchandise, but the theory of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Insurance Co. of North America v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Great American Ins. Co. v. DoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Western Assurance Co. v. McGlatherySupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co. v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- North River Insurance v. WaddellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crump v. Geer Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- UNITED SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. St. ClairAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
- Northern Assur. Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Commercial U. Ins. Co. v. RyalsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Farmers & Ginners Cotton Oil Co. v. Reliance InsuranceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976