Legal Opinion

Sussex Fire Ins. Co. v. Barton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 10, 1932No. 6 Div. 151PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The action is on a policy of fire insurance. A storehouse, stock of merchandise, and store furniture and fixtures were insured in the gross sum of $3,500. The insurance on the house was $1,000, on the stock of merchandise $2,000, and on the furniture and fixtures $500.

Count 1 of the complaint was in code form, claiming the gross sum for a total loss of the insured property by fire.

Defendant- presented certain special pleas setting up breaches of the iron-safe clause as a full answer to the complaint. Admittedly the iron-safe clause is limited to-the stock of merchandise, but the theory of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. of North America v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Great American Ins. Co. v. DoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Western Assurance Co. v. McGlatherySupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  4. Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co. v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. North River Insurance v. WaddellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crump v. Geer Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. UNITED SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. St. ClairAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Northern Assur. Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Commercial U. Ins. Co. v. RyalsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Farmers & Ginners Cotton Oil Co. v. Reliance InsuranceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API