Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sealed Air Corp. v. U.S. International Trade Commission

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 12, 1981No. C.A. 79-35 and 80-4; No. 79-35; No. 80-4; ITC Investigation No. 337 TA 54Published

1Concurrence

Nies, J.,

with whom Baldwin, J. joins, concurring with respect to Appeal No. 79-35 and dissenting with respect to Appeal No. 80-4.

By affirming that the Tong Seae process would not, if practiced in the United States, infringe U.S. Patent No. 3,416,984 owned by the complainant Sealed Air, this court has no alternative but to vacate the order below and remand for the ITC’s determination of violation of 19 U.S.C. 1337 based on the evidence with respect to the processes of others. An exclusion order must be supported by factual findings based on reliable, probative, and substantial evidence (5…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API