Romantix, Inc. v. City of Commerce City
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge TERRY.
In this appeal, we consider the application of a city code provision that imposes a tax on the granting of a license to use tangible personal property. The City of Commerce City (City) appeals the district court's summary judgment for Romantix, Inc. (Roman-tix). The district court determined that Ro-mantix was entitled to a refund for payments it made under the City's Sales and Use Tax Code (code). We reverse and remand to the district court with directions to grant the City's cross-motion for summary judgment.
I. Background
The parties stipulated to the following facts.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Transponder Corp. of Denver v. Property Tax AdministratorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Town of Erie v. EasonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- City of Boulder v. Leanin' Tree, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Asphalt Specialties, Co. v. City of Commerce CityColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- American Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. City of WestminsterColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. v. City of BoulderColorado Court of Appeals · 2012