Legal Opinion

Romantix, Inc. v. City of Commerce City

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 2010No. 09CA1548PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TERRY.

In this appeal, we consider the application of a city code provision that imposes a tax on the granting of a license to use tangible personal property. The City of Commerce City (City) appeals the district court's summary judgment for Romantix, Inc. (Roman-tix). The district court determined that Ro-mantix was entitled to a refund for payments it made under the City's Sales and Use Tax Code (code). We reverse and remand to the district court with directions to grant the City's cross-motion for summary judgment.

I. Background

The parties stipulated to the following facts.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Transponder Corp. of Denver v. Property Tax AdministratorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Town of Erie v. EasonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. City of Boulder v. Leanin' Tree, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  4. Asphalt Specialties, Co. v. City of Commerce CityColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. American Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. City of WestminsterColorado Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. v. City of BoulderColorado Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API