United States v. Roy Rogers Fauntleroy
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
Roy Rogers Fauntleroy appeals from his conviction by the district court sitting without a jury on two counts charging him with knowingly making false statements in the purchase of firearms in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6). 1 Fauntleroy was sentenced to concurrent three-year prison terms on the two counts.
Fauntleroy contends on appeal that (1) the prosecution failed to adduce sufficient evidence showing that he possessed the requisite intent to knowingly make a false oral or written statement with regard to his prior felony conviction, and (2) § 922(a)(6) violates the due process clause…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Roy Braswell ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Michael J. WeatherfordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- United States v. CabblerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Douglas MacArthur BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. William O. HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Black v. SnowDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- United States v. Gary O. McKenzieCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Richard HarrisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- United States v. George Roger HeathCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.