Legal Opinion

Duke v. Low

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1931Published

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Three alleged errors are assigned in defendants’ brief by reason of which a reversal of the decree of the circuit court is sought.

It is urged that the circuit court erred in directing the clerk to satisfy the judgment in suit.

That the circuit court erred in sustaining the demurrer to defendants’ answer.

That the circuit court erred in enjoining the sale upon execution of plaintiff’s real property.

We are of the opinion that the first assignment of error is not before us.

The statute prescribes that any person discharged from his debts, pursuant to the bankruptcy act, may file in any court or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Liberty Nat. Bank of Roanoke v. BearSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Gregory Co. v. CaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Hillyer v. . LeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Miller v. BartoIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API