Legal Opinion

Grosjean v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1946No. 30550PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

In the case of Wilson v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co., 135 Ohio St., 560, 21 N. E. (2d), 865, this court announced the following rule:

“In an action brought by an owner of livestock against a terminal carrier to recover damages sustained during shipment, the owner makes out a prima facie case when he introduces evidence that the livestock was unaccompanied by himself or his caretaker, was received for shipment by the initial carrier in good condition and delivered at the destination by the terminal carrier in an injured or damaged condition.”

Putting the proposition a little differently, a prima facie…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. WordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Weissinger Tobacco Co. v. Van BurenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Nugent v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  4. Wilson v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Bloecher & Schaaf, Inc. v. Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cupps v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Trees v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Franck v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API