Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cunningham v. New York State Department of Labor

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2013Published

1Concurrence

Abdus-Salaam, J. (concurring).

The majority’s application of the workplace exception to the warrant requirement may be a well-intentioned effort to smooth the way for government employers to investigate time theft and other workplace misconduct. However, the majority’s decision has expanded this exception well beyond its intended scope, and has run afoul of the protections afforded by New York Constitution, article I, § 12 and the Fourth Amendment by infringing on a government employee’s “reasonable expectation of privacy” (Katz v United States, 389 US 347, 360 [1967, Harlan, J., concurring]).

I…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Filarsky v. DeliaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. People v. WeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API