Legal Opinion

Aetna Inc. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 20, 2022No. 3:22-cv-00740Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AETNA INC., Case No. 22-cv-00740-EMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 9 v. MOTION TO REMAND, AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ CROSS- 10 GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., et al., MOTION 11 Defendants. Docket Nos. 18, 26 12 13 14 Aetna initiated this antitrust lawsuit in state court against Gilead, BMS, and Janssen. In its 15 complaint, it asserted only state law claims. Gilead subsequently removed the case to federal 16 court. Currently pending before the Court is Aetna’s motion to remand and Defendants’ cross- 17 motion to enjoin…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Wilson v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API