Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Hickman

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided January 8, 1941No. 699Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

Able and zealous counsel have earnestly urged a reconsideration of my opinion wherein I held the above case should be remanded to the state court from which it was removed.

Numerous opinions written by district judges have been cited as holding a view far different from mine. These have been examined but are not convincing.

This cause was removed upon the theory that a federal question is involved. Such theory was predicated upon the language of paragraph numbered (8) of Section 41,' Title 28 U.S.C.A., relating to the general subject of original jurisdiction of federal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Devine v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Arkansas v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ann Arbor RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Bankers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Sainte Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Connolly v. First Nat. Bank-DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API