Legal Opinion

McCarrell v. Harrisonburg Mutual Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 11, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, J.

This writ of error brings under review an award made by the Industrial Commission.

The finding of facts as stated by the Commission is as follows: “It was mutually agreed between the parties in interest that the claimant in the instant case lost by reason of the accident sustained on May 11, 1932, fifty per cent of the use of each foot.”

The Commission allowed compensation for total incapacity from the date of the injury to September 15, 1932, and for permanent partial incapacity for one hundred and twenty-five weeks thereafter. Claimant contends that he should have been allowed compensation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gobble v. Clinch Valley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  2. Crawford v. Virginia Iron, Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Virginia Oak Flooring Co. v. ChrisleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  2. Nicely v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  3. Owen v. the Chesapeake CorporationSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  4. Borden, Inc. v. NormanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  5. McCarrell v. Harrisonburg Mutual Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API