Legal Opinion

Boris v. Moore

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided June 12, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 4724PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

This action was brought to recover royalties under a patent and an injunction and equitable relief.

There is before the court the motion of the defendant Moore to dismiss this action as to him, under Rules 12(a) and 12(b), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A., on the ground that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and alternatively for judgment on the pleadings, under Rule 12(c). This motion is brought at the conclusion of the trial in this case of the separate defense of laches, which was severed by order of this court pursuant to Rule 42(b).

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Penobscot Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Asher v. RuppaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  3. Carroll v. Morrison Hotel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  4. Everett James Peckham v. M. P. ScanlonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  5. Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co. v. KrugCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boris v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1957
  2. Boris v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  3. Boris v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API