Legal Opinion

Judson v. Newark Board of Works Pension Ass'n

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 19, 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment is affirmed, and generally for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Chief Justice Brogan for the Supreme Court.

Retirement on half-pay, as the Chief Justice says, is the undoubted legislative policy; and the allowance of pensions under both statutes (R. 8. 43:12-1, et seq. and R. S. 43:19 — 9a) would do violence to that design.

However, it is pointed out in the opinion that relator’s involuntary retirement under R. 8. 43:12 — 1, was accomplished by a resolution adopted November 4th, 1942, making the retirement effective as of the succeeding December 31st; and it is said that…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Craster v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF NEWARKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. Flynn v. Union CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Craster v. Board of CommissionersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Salz v. State House CommissionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API