Judson v. Newark Board of Works Pension Ass'n
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed, and generally for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Chief Justice Brogan for the Supreme Court.
Retirement on half-pay, as the Chief Justice says, is the undoubted legislative policy; and the allowance of pensions under both statutes (R. 8. 43:12-1, et seq. and R. S. 43:19 — 9a) would do violence to that design.
However, it is pointed out in the opinion that relator’s involuntary retirement under R. 8. 43:12 — 1, was accomplished by a resolution adopted November 4th, 1942, making the retirement effective as of the succeeding December 31st; and it is said that…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Craster v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF NEWARKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Flynn v. Union CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Craster v. Board of CommissionersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Salz v. State House CommissionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954