Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ward v. City of Lincoln

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1910No. 16,718Published

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Willard E. Stewart, Judge.

1DissentBosk, J.

My understanding of the facts pleaded by plaintiff and of the law applicable thereto leads me to dissent from the opinion and the conclusion of the majority. The petition does not contain a copy of the contract between the city and the contractor avIio constructed the sidewalks. It does allege, however, that the contractor, R. J. Gaddis, agreed -with the city' to construct sideAvalks in front of lots 7 to 12, inclusive, in block 4, Fitzgerald’s second addition, and that the city “agreed to pay for said sidewalks from funds to be realised from assessments and special taa-cs on said lotsP If…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peake v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Wilson v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. City of Greencastle v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Goodrich v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  5. City of Huntington v. ForceIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API