Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 5, 1861PublishedCited by 3 opinions

CASE 3 —BECOGNIZANCE— APPEAL FROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT. cited Grim, Code, sections 92, 8.1, 82; lb., title 5, chapter 1. cited Grim. Code, sections 343, 92.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE BULLITT

delivered the opinion op the court:

In July 1855, one Magerhaus having been arrested upon a justice’s warrant, charged with keeping a gaming table, the appellant became his surety in a bond ior $600, to be void if Magerhaus should appear at the next December term of the Campbell circuit court to answer said charge, and not depart thence without leave of the court.

At said December term, Magerhaus appeared and became bound in a recognizance for $500, with one Pflander as his surety, to appear at the next term, and the cause was continued. In December, 1856, the sheriff arrested…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gillis v. CobeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  2. Electric Supply & Maintenance Co. v. Conway Electric Light & Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Manson v. ArnoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API